Connect with us

News

Ghaziabad Colony Receives Demolition Notice: 172 Houses to Be Razed Within 15 Days

Published

on

In a shocking development, authorities in Ghaziabad have issued a demolition notice to a local colony, ordering that 172 houses be torn down within 15 days.

This move has thrown hundreds of families into uncertainty, raising questions about housing rights, urban planning, and governance.


Why the Demolition Notice Was Issued

According to Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) officials, the colony was built on unauthorized land, violating zoning and environmental laws.

The key reasons behind the decision include:

  • Encroachment on land designated for public infrastructure and green zones.
  • Absence of required building approvals and occupancy certificates.
  • Safety risks posed by haphazard construction in flood-prone or environmentally sensitive areas.

Details of the Affected Colony

The colony in question is located near Raj Nagar Extension, a rapidly developing area in Ghaziabad known for its affordable housing projects.

Approximately 172 houses, many of which have been occupied for years, have been declared illegal. Several families claimed they had purchased these houses in good faith, unaware of legal violations by builders and developers.


Legal Status and Unauthorized Constructions

Unauthorized colonies are a major challenge in NCR cities, including Ghaziabad. Builders often develop plots without adhering to municipal guidelines, and unsuspecting buyers fall into the trap.

Key legal issues include:

  • Lack of approved layout plans.
  • Non-payment of development charges to the authorities.
  • Absence of proper drainage, sewage, and fire safety systems.

Officials argue that these demolitions are necessary to enforce urban planning norms and prevent future illegal settlements.


Residents’ Reactions and Emotional Turmoil

The notice has sparked widespread fear and anger among residents:

  • Many have invested their life savings into these homes.
  • Families with elderly members and children are particularly worried about immediate displacement.
  • Several residents staged protests outside the GDA office, demanding a stay on demolitions.

Emotional statements like “Where will we go with our children in just 15 days?” reflect the deep distress caused by this sudden action.


Government and Municipal Corporation’s Stand

The Ghaziabad Development Authority maintains that:

  • Residents were repeatedly warned about the colony’s illegal status.
  • Multiple notices had been served over the past few years, but no corrective measures were taken.
  • Strict action is essential to maintain law and order and reclaim public land.

The administration has offered assistance in finding temporary shelters, but residents argue that these solutions are inadequate.


Humanitarian and Social Impact

Beyond legalities, this demolition will deeply affect:

  • Children’s education, as many might be forced to leave schools mid-session.
  • Livelihoods, with home-based businesses and workers facing immediate disruption.
  • Community bonds, as families built over years will be broken overnight.

Human rights activists have criticized the lack of a comprehensive rehabilitation plan, urging authorities to focus on inclusive urban development.


Possible Legal Remedies for Homeowners

Experts suggest residents can:

  • Approach the High Court for a stay order against demolition.
  • File collective Public Interest Litigations (PILs) highlighting builder fraud and administrative negligence.
  • Seek compensation from builders under consumer protection laws.

Lawyers advise affected families to collect all purchase-related documents and maintain records of payments and communications with builders.


The Future of Urban Encroachments in Ghaziabad

This incident serves as a warning about the dangers of unauthorized colonies:

  • Buyers must verify land titles, approvals, and municipal clearances before purchasing properties.
  • Authorities are likely to increase crackdowns on illegal constructions to streamline urban planning.

At a broader level, it signals the urgent need for transparent, builder-accountable housing policies in fast-growing cities like Ghaziabad.


Conclusion

The demolition notice to 172 houses in Ghaziabad highlights the fragile balance between urban growth and law enforcement.

While unauthorized constructions cannot be ignored, sudden large-scale demolitions without robust rehabilitation plans leave innocent families vulnerable and homeless.

This situation calls for a compassionate yet firm approach, holding fraudulent builders accountable while protecting common citizens from becoming collateral damage in development battles.

Veer Rana

Veer Rana is a seasoned journalist with a sharp eye for current affairs and public policy. With in-depth knowledge in politics, economy, education, and environmental issues, Veer delivers fact-based, insightful content that drives understanding in complex domains. He also covers health and wellness under lifestyle, bringing credible and actionable advice to readers.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

No Helmet No Petrol Rule in Capital from August 1: Collector Issues Strict Order

Published

on

In a significant move toward enhancing road safety and curbing accident fatalities, the district collectors of Bhopal and Indore have issued a firm directive: From August 1, 2025, no petrol shall be given to two-wheeler riders who are not wearing helmets.

This rule is a direct response to rising accident statistics, especially among youth, delivery agents, and local commuters who often ignore helmet safety.


Why This Rule, and Why Now?

According to traffic department data, head injuries contribute to over 60% of two-wheeler fatalities in urban India. Despite awareness campaigns, many riders either do not wear helmets or wear them improperly (e.g., unstrapped). The “No Helmet, No Petrol” policy seeks to introduce behavioral pressure at the fuel station level — where refusal of service can act as a deterrent.

Collector’s Intent

The District Collectors have emphasized that the decision isn’t meant to penalize, but to instill a life-saving habit. Enforcement through fuel stations ensures the rule touches every rider, every day.


Rule at a Glance

RuleDetails
Start DateAugust 1, 2025
ApplicabilityAll petrol pumps in Bhopal & Indore
Who It AffectsTwo-wheeler drivers and pillion riders
Enforcement AuthorityDistrict Collector, Transport Department
Penalty for PumpsPossible license scrutiny for violations
Emergency ExemptionsCase-specific; subject to official discretion

Real Impact on Citizens

Delivery Workers & Daily Commuters

This rule directly affects Zomato/Swiggy riders, e-commerce delivery agents, and gig workers, many of whom skip helmets due to comfort, heat, or carelessness. Employers may now face pressure to ensure helmet compliance as a condition for fuel and therefore productivity.

Families & Students

Parents dropping kids, college students riding without protective gear — these habits may now see a strong correction.


Legal Backing & Precedents

The Supreme Court Committee on Road Safety has repeatedly advised Indian states to link fuel or service denial to helmet and seatbelt compliance.

States like Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu have either tested or implemented this rule. In UP, the No Helmet, No Fuel policy went statewide earlier in 2025 and received strong support from safety activists.


Public Reaction: Mixed, but Largely Supportive

Supporters Say:

  • “Finally, something that forces people to care for their own safety.”
  • “I hope this cuts down accidents. People don’t realize one moment of laziness can kill.”

Critics Say:

  • “What if I forgot my helmet just once and need urgent fuel?”
  • “Delivery workers have deadlines — this delays them more.”

To counter backlash, the administration is considering soft implementation for the first week with warnings, not fines, and special consideration for medical/emergency travel.


What Petrol Pump Operators Need to Do

  • Display “No Helmet, No Petrol” signboards clearly at all fuel stations.
  • Train staff to politely deny fuel and note vehicle registration numbers of repeat violators.
Veer Rana

Veer Rana is a seasoned journalist with a sharp eye for current affairs and public policy. With in-depth knowledge in politics, economy, education, and environmental issues, Veer delivers fact-based, insightful content that drives understanding in complex domains. He also covers health and wellness under lifestyle, bringing credible and actionable advice to readers.

Continue Reading

Business

LIC‑Owned NBFC Stock in Focus Post This Update

Published

on

What’s Making the Stock Noteworthy?

  • Paisalo Digital—a LIC-backed NBFC—is making headlines after approving several fundraising initiatives that have shifted investor sentiment. One such move includes issuing Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) worth up to ₹50 crore, with a 10% coupon over a 24-month term
  • The stock gained significantly after announcing a co‑lending loan agreement with State Bank of India (SBI), aimed at expanding SME lending via digital platforms, leading to a sharp 7% intraday rise in late June
  • Earlier in June, it approved issuance of short-term commercial papers totaling ₹30 crore, which helped the stock rebound from its lows

Stock Performance Snapshot

  • Currently trading under ₹50, Paisalo Digital’s share price has surged 9–10% in recent trading sessions amid strong market reaction to dividend announcements and Q1 earnings
  • That marks a rebound after a sharp YTD decline of nearly 39%, and in the past year alone, the stock has lost over 60% in value
  • Despite its small-cap status, the company has delivered over 175% returns over five years, making it a multibagger—but with high volatility and significant downside risk
  • Recent regulatory filings also show institutional investor interest, with Equilibrated Venture increasing its promoter stake to around 15.67% of total shares

Why Is It in Focus?

  1. Aggressive Capital Raising Moves
    • The NCD allotment (up to ₹50 cr) bolsters the company’s working capital, while the SBI co-lending tie-up positions it as a serious contender in SME lending
  2. Growth Versus Risk
    • Despite the bullish fundraises, Paisalo faces tight margins and regulatory headwinds. Broader sentiment in the NBFC sector—especially after concerns over Bajaj Finance’s post-earnings decline—is adding to caution
  3. Stock Sentiment & Momentum
    • Unexpected dividend news and board decisions have created short-term buying pressure, but structural weakness and steep recent declines suggest high risk remains

Comparison with LIC Housing Finance (LIC HFL)

While Paisalo captures headlines, its sister company LIC Housing Finance (LIC HFL)—also LIC-owned—offers much more stability but slower growth:

  • As of the latest trading, LIC HFL trades around ₹620 on NSE/BSE, with a P/E ratio of ~6.3, well below the sector average of 12–15
  • In Q4 FY2025, LIC HFL reported a 25% YoY PAT growth, declaring a 500% dividend payout and showing a loan book increase of around 7% YoY. However, net interest margins declined slightly to ~2.73–2.86%
  • Technical analysts note a bearish rising‑wedge formation in LIC HFL’s chart, which may signal near-term pullbacks. Strategic options plays like a “Broken Wing” strategy are being recommended for conservative traders
  • LIC HFL also recently launched India’s first-listed residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) edition, raising ₹10 billion via AAA-rated 20‑year securities—highlighting its institutional credibility and innovation

Conclusion & Investor Takeaway

NBFCKey Attributes
Paisalo DigitalSmall-cap, high volatility, aggressive fundraising, recent IPO/dividend-driven BJP
LIC HFLLarge-cap, stable housing finance play, reliable dividends, expansion via structured debt products
  • Paisalo Digital remains a speculative, high-risk, high-return play: its recent fundraises and strategic partnerships could pay off if execution is solid—but sentiment remains fragile.
  • LIC Housing Finance, on the other hand, is more suited for conservative investors seeking steady income, institutional innovation, and stability in the NBFC housing space.
  • Broader sector caution remains due to macro pressures and recent NBFC volatility—Bajaj Finance’s decline casts a long shadow over smaller players too
Veer Rana

Veer Rana is a seasoned journalist with a sharp eye for current affairs and public policy. With in-depth knowledge in politics, economy, education, and environmental issues, Veer delivers fact-based, insightful content that drives understanding in complex domains. He also covers health and wellness under lifestyle, bringing credible and actionable advice to readers.

Continue Reading

Crime & Investigation

Delhi Police SI Neetu Bisht Caught Taking ₹20 Lakh Bribe – Shocking Details Emerge in Corruption Probe

Published

on

Summary at a Glance:

  • Delhi Police Sub-Inspector Neetu Bisht arrested in a high-profile bribery trap
  • Accused of extorting ₹50 lakh from a Delhi doctor; ₹20.5 lakh already taken
  • 5 arrests made, including 2 other police personnel and 2 civilians
  • FIR filed under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act
  • Case sparks outrage and renewed questions over corruption in Indian law enforcement

What Happened?

On July 28, 2025, a dramatic corruption scandal came to light at Paschim Vihar East Police Station, Delhi, when Vigilance officials caught Sub-Inspector Neetu Bisht red-handed taking a ₹20 lakh bribe.

The arrest followed a detailed complaint by a Delhi-based doctor who alleged:

  • He was being threatened and harassed by certain police officials.
  • A total bribe of ₹50 lakh was being demanded.
  • ₹20.5 lakh had already been paid under pressure.

The complaint triggered a sting operation by Delhi Vigilance, who worked with the victim to trap the accused during the next scheduled payment.


The Arrest: How It Unfolded

  • Sub-Inspector Neetu Bisht was caught while accepting the bribe amount inside the police station.
  • Along with her, Head Constable Rajendra, Constable Shyam, and two civilians were arrested.
  • The civilians, acquaintances of the complainant, were allegedly used to mediate and “convince” the victim to pay.

The complainant also told officials that he was taken to a Peeragarhi police booth, where he was:

  • Physically assaulted
  • Threatened with false charges
  • Forced to sign blank documents and hand over money

What Charges Are Being Filed?

The FIR includes:

  • Sections under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for criminal intimidation, conspiracy, and extortion
  • Provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
  • Charges of abuse of power, dereliction of duty, and criminal breach of trust

All five accused are currently under police remand, and internal departmental inquiries have been launched.


What the Complainant Claims

According to the complainant (a reputed Delhi-based doctor), the entire ordeal began over a business-related property dispute.

He alleged: Initially they asked for ₹50 lakh to drop a fabricated case. I paid ₹20.5 lakh out of fear. But then they kept calling and demanding the rest

When threats escalated, the doctor turned to the Anti-Corruption Bureau, which coordinated with Delhi Vigilance to execute the sting.


What Evidence Has Been Found?

  • CCTV footage from Peeragarhi booth during the alleged assault
  • Phone call recordings where threats were issued
  • Bank transfer proof of ₹20.5 lakh paid earlier
  • Cash recovered during the sting

Officials say this is a “solid case with layered conspiracy involving both uniformed and civilian accomplices.”


The Bigger Picture – A Symptom of a Deeper Problem

Neetu Bisht’s arrest has reopened conversations around systemic corruption in Delhi Police.

Between 2015 and 2024:

  • Over 250 police officers in Delhi were booked for corruption
  • 58 were dismissed permanently
  • Most actions have been limited to lower-rank personnel; few senior officials have been held accountable

Activist Ravi Kumar, who monitors police reform, says: These are not isolated events. They reflect a culture of extortion and impunity within the law enforcement system.


Why This Case Stands Out

While bribery cases are unfortunately not rare, what makes this one shocking:

  • The involvement of a female officer – still rare in such high-stakes extortion cases
  • The amount involved (₹50 lakh) is exceptionally large
  • The crime was allegedly committed within the police station premises
  • Use of police infrastructure for intimidation (Peeragarhi booth)

Public Reaction

The case has sparked debate across social media:

  • “How can we trust the police when they’re the ones looting us?” – Twitter user
  • “This doctor could speak out. How many others couldn’t?” – Facebook commenter
  • “Delhi Police needs deep cleaning, not just suspensions.” – Reddit post
Veer Rana

Veer Rana is a seasoned journalist with a sharp eye for current affairs and public policy. With in-depth knowledge in politics, economy, education, and environmental issues, Veer delivers fact-based, insightful content that drives understanding in complex domains. He also covers health and wellness under lifestyle, bringing credible and actionable advice to readers.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Toplisted.