Army clears Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit for promotion after acquittal in Malegaon blast case

The Indian Army has reportedly cleared Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Shrikant Purohit for promotion to the rank of Brigadier, marking a significant development in a case that has spanned nearly two decades.

This decision follows an intervention by the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), which had earlier stayed his retirement, originally scheduled for March 31, 2026. The tribunal directed authorities to hold off on retirement until his pending statutory complaint—seeking promotion and service benefits—was resolved.

Background: Impact of long trial on career

Lt Col Purohit had approached the tribunal arguing that his career progression was severely affected due to the prolonged legal proceedings in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. He maintained that:

• The extended trial denied him fair promotion opportunities
• His service record was overshadowed by pending allegations
• He deserved reconsideration after acquittal

Acquittal in Malegaon blast case

In July 2025, a special court of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) acquitted Purohit and six others, stating that:

• The prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt
• Evidence presented during the trial was insufficient

Among those acquitted were:

• Pragya Singh Thakur (former MP)
• Ramesh Upadhyay
• Sudhakar Chaturvedi
• Ajay Rahirkar
• Sudhankar Dhar Dwivedi
• Sameer Kulkarni

Originally, 11 individuals were accused, but charges were ultimately framed against 7, all of whom were acquitted.

The 2008 Malegaon blast

The incident occurred on September 29, 2008, in Malegaon, when:

• A bomb strapped to a motorcycle exploded near a mosque in Bhikku Chowk
• 6 people were killed
• Around 95 others were injured

The case was initially investigated by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad before being transferred to the NIA in 2011.

Investigation and legal journey

• The investigation spanned nearly 17 years
• Hundreds of witnesses were examined
• Charges were filed under laws including:
  • Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA)
  • Arms Act

Ultimately, the court acquitted all accused, citing lack of conclusive evidence.

What the promotion means

The Army’s decision to clear Purohit for promotion suggests:

• Recognition of his acquittal and reinstated standing
• Consideration of career setbacks caused by prolonged litigation
• Possible restoration of seniority and service benefits (subject to final approvals)

Key takeaway

This case highlights the long-term impact of delayed judicial processes on careers, especially in sensitive roles like the military. The tribunal’s intervention and the Army’s decision may set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.