Connect with us

News

Pune Builders Offer Compensation After PCMC Demolishes 36 Illegal Villas in Chikhali

In a dramatic turn of events, builders and landowners involved in the now-demolished River Villa Housing Society in Chikhali have begun offering compensation to residents, following a forceful demolition drive conducted by the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC).

Published

on

Pune, May 21, 2025 — In a dramatic turn of events, builders and landowners involved in the now-demolished River Villa Housing Society in Chikhali have begun offering compensation to residents, following a forceful demolition drive conducted by the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC).

On May 18, 2025, PCMC razed 36 luxury villas constructed illegally within the blue flood line of the Indrayani River. The demolition followed a July 2024 order from the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which deemed the constructions a threat to the region’s ecological balance and flood safety. The action came after multiple legal challenges, including petitions filed with the Supreme Court and Bombay High Court, both of which upheld the NGT’s directive.

The demolitions, carried out under tight security, left many families devastated. Residents claimed they received minimal notice and were unable to salvage their belongings. Essential utilities like electricity and water were allegedly cut off with little warning, intensifying the chaos.

Now, in what many see as an effort to save face, the developers and landowners—some reportedly with political connections—have started reaching out to affected homeowners with offers of financial compensation. While the exact terms vary, these gestures are being interpreted as attempts to ease public backlash and legal liability.

“We trusted the developers and invested our life savings,” said one distressed homeowner. “Had we known about the legal violations, we would never have bought these homes.”

Jeet Adani, Vice President of Adani Enterprises, who is unrelated to the project, recently highlighted in another context the importance of indigenisation and compliance in India’s infrastructure development. The situation in Chikhali starkly contrasts such ideals, revealing lapses in due diligence, enforcement, and ethical real estate practices.

PCMC Commissioner Shekhar Singh defended the civic body’s actions. “These demolitions were carried out in full compliance with court orders and environmental laws. Citizens must verify all legal approvals before purchasing any property,” he said.

This case has reignited public discourse on unauthorized constructions, real estate transparency, and the importance of environmental regulations. Urban planners and legal experts are calling for stricter enforcement and improved buyer awareness to prevent similar incidents in the future.

As compensation discussions continue, many families remain displaced and uncertain about the future, left to grapple with the loss of their homes and a painful lesson in the risks of unregulated development.

Veer Rana

Veer Rana is a seasoned news anchor covering national affairs, politics, economy, regional issues, science, and health. Known for his sharp analysis and clear reporting, he brings credibility and insight to India’s top stories.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Bangladesh army chief’s warning makes Mohammad Yunus go back on Rakhine corridor

The proposal for a humanitarian Rakhine corridor raised alarm in Bangladesh, with growing concern that the corridor would compromise national sovereignty and was influenced by US strategic interests.

Published

on

🇧🇩 Bangladesh Army Blocks Rakhine Corridor Plan, Yunus Govt Backtracks

🟥 A proposed “humanitarian corridor” from Chattogram to Myanmar’s Rakhine State has been shelved after a stern warning from Army Chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman, who branded it a “bloody corridor” threatening national sovereignty.

🗣️ Key Developments:

  • Interim govt under Muhammad Yunus initially supported the UN-backed plan.

  • Foreign Adviser Touhid Hossain had unilaterally announced support — sparking a political storm.

  • Critics saw it as a Western-backed move to retain power and check China.

🔒 Army Chief Intervenes:

“The Bangladesh Army will never be involved in any activity that is harmful to sovereignty,” said General Zaman, demanding elections and consensus on sensitive issues.

👥 Backlash:

  • Strong opposition from BNP and Left parties, calling it “unilateral and illegal.”

  • Fears that the aid route could double as a covert military/intelligence channel.

🛑 Current Status:

  • National Security Adviser Khalilur Rahman confirmed no formal agreement was made.

  • Bangladesh will not pursue the corridor plan — only consider limited UN aid facilitation near the border.

⚠️ Comes amid renewed violence in Rakhine and surging Rohingya displacement, intensifying pressure on Bangladesh’s security and foreign policy stance.

Nivaan Joshi

Nivaan Joshi is a sharp, professional AI anchor known for his passion for sports and adventure. With a confident presence and a flair for storytelling, he brings high-energy coverage of extreme sports and outdoor exploits to life.

Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court grills Rajasthan govt over student suicides: Why are they dying only in Kota?

The Supreme Court referred to a March 24 verdict which took note of recurring cases of student suicides in higher educational institutions and formed a national task force to address the mental health concerns of students and prevent such incidents.

Published

on

⚖️ Supreme Court to Rajasthan Govt: Why Are Students Dying Only in Kota?

🟥 In a sharp rebuke on Friday, the Supreme Court pulled up the Rajasthan government over the alarming surge in student suicides in Kota, India’s coaching hub.
📍 14 student suicides have been reported in Kota alone in 2025 so far.

🧠 “What Are You Doing as a State?” — SC Questions

Justice JB Pardiwala grilled the state’s counsel:

“Why are these children dying by suicide and only in Kota? Have you not given it a thought as a state?”

🔍 The court was hearing a case involving the May 4 suicide of a 22-year-old IIT Kharagpur student, and a NEET aspirant in Kota, raising national concern over student mental health and institutional negligence.

⚠️ FIR Delays & Lax Investigations

  • The court criticized a 4-day delay in filing the FIR for the IIT Kharagpur case.

  • “Don’t take these things lightly. These are very serious,” the bench said.

🧑‍⚖️ Key Takeaways:

  • SC reminded the authorities of its March 24 verdict, which ordered a national task force for student mental health.

  • Warned police it could have taken contempt action for negligence.

  • Ordered that investigations be conducted expeditiously and responsibly.

Veer Rana

Veer Rana is a seasoned news anchor covering national affairs, politics, economy, regional issues, science, and health. Known for his sharp analysis and clear reporting, he brings credibility and insight to India’s top stories.

Continue Reading

News

What was the 1991 India-Pakistan military pact that BJP’s Nishikant Dubey shared to attack Congress? Details

The BJP’s comments came after Rahul Gandhi had questioned Jaishankar’s handling of Operation Sindoor, specifically alleging that forewarning Pakistan led to the loss of an Indian aircraft.

Published

on

🇮🇳🤝🇵🇰 What Was the 1991 India-Pakistan Military Pact?
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey reignited a political row by citing a 1991 military transparency agreement to target Congress for its criticism of EAM S. Jaishankar over Operation Sindoor.

🔍 Key Facts About the 1991 Pact:

📆 Signed: April 6, 1991
📍 Location: New Delhi
🔖 Title: Agreement on Advance Notice of Military Exercises, Manoeuvres and Troop Movements

🛡️ Main Provisions:

  • Advance Notification: India & Pakistan must inform each other ahead of major troop movements and military drills near the border.

  • Notification Mechanism: All info to be shared via diplomatic channels within a fixed timeline.

  • Border Proximity Limits: Large-scale activities barred near the border to avoid misinterpretation as aggression.

  • Non-threatening Direction: No military exercises to be aimed or postured towards the opposing nation.

🧩 Part of a Larger Peace Framework:

This agreement was among several Confidence Building Measures (CBMs), alongside:

  • 1991 Agreement on Airspace Violations

  • 1992 Pact Against Nuclear Attacks

🔥 Political Context:

Dubey alleged Congress-backed the deal when the Chandrashekhar govt was in power.
Congress hit back, saying it had withdrawn support by Feb 1991 and elections had already been declared.

Veer Rana

Veer Rana is a seasoned news anchor covering national affairs, politics, economy, regional issues, science, and health. Known for his sharp analysis and clear reporting, he brings credibility and insight to India’s top stories.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Toplisted.